"Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words can break my heart..." Linda McCartney

Archive for the ‘Barack Obama’ Category

♫Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday, Everyday…

In Agape Love, Barack Obama, Civility, History, Living, Manners, Politics, Racism, Society on September 15, 2009 at 12:46 pm

“On the other hand, the fruitage of the spirit is love, joy, peace, long-suffering, kindness, goodness, faith, mildness, self-control.” Gal. 5:22,23

Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday, Everyday...

Elizabeth Eckford and Hazel Bryan

Elizabeth Eckford, followed and taunted by an angry crowd after she was denied entrance to Little Rock Central High School, September 4, 1957. (Will Counts Collection/Indiana University Archives.)

And Repeat…  Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday, Everyday...

September 11th Teabagger Festival, on September 12, 2009

September 11th Teabagger Festival, on September 12, 2009

Then, also, many… will hate one another. and … the love of the greater number will cool off. Matt 24:10-12

Ooooo… oooo…whaaaa aahhh  aaahhhhSee full size image



Lamps and Dining Room Tables

In Barack Obama, Cable News Networks, Health Care Reform on August 19, 2009 at 10:22 pm
revolting

Outrageous!

“Your word is a lamp to my foot, and a light to my roadway.” Ps 119:105

Way to go, Congressman Barney Frank! I saw the news last night.  Oh, boy.   Somewhere between the YouTube message from Michael Jackson’s doctor Conrad Murray and the breaking news about the arrest of Survivor winner Richard Hatch, CNN and Fox News managed to squeeze in a clip of you expressing exasperation and righteous outrage over one determined young woman’s attempt to make like a programmed latter day Stepford wife and demonstrate her ignorance and the fruit of her idealogical brainwashing while clutching a tattered picture similar to the one on the left in her cold, undead hand, at a town hall meeting Tuesday night in Dartmouth, Mass.

The raucous, hyperbolic  ranting of these so-called “concerned citizens” raises the specter of Willie Horton.  Remember him?  The Republican’s used him to good advantage to scare whites and derail the presidential campaign of Michael Dukakis in 1988.

As I was preparing this morning to write a blog post about it, I stumbled across this blog post on FDL (fire dog lake):  Early Morning Swim: Rachel Finds a Willie Horton Connection Behind Town Hall Protests By: Blue Texan Friday August 14, 2009 4:47 am

Rachel Maddow.  Looks like she’s abandoned the Drew Carey style glasses.  Way to go, Rachel Maddow!  Good lookin’ out!

Then I stumbled across a blog published on WordPress.  The title:  Barack the Black Hitler by a 25 year old fellow from San Diego, CA named Fred Shelm (if that’s his real name). Here is a portion of the introduction:

But now America has a new star politician, Obama, and the parallels between he and the most loathed man in history are very real. In this article, we will examine the methods of assuming power employed by both men, and the role of their decisions in the lives (and deaths) of six millions jews.

You have to see it to believe it.

Could young Fred Shelm (if that’s his real name) have developed these “ideas” entirely on his own?  If so, what could have influenced and informed such thinking in the face of all verifiable facts? Could Fred Shelm be the “father”of the so-called “concerned citizen ‘grassroots’” movement currently disrupting town hall meetings throughout the nation? Who is Fred Shelm?  What are his affiliations?  Is he the 21st century David Duke?  It’s interesting to note that his WordPress blog posts, Facebook pages and Diggs all stopped in November, 2008.  What’s he doing now?  Doesn’t appear to be a Tweeter.

It would be beneficial to the majority of honest-hearted Americans and a relief to the rest of us to have our unspoken suspicions confirmed:  That perhaps Mr. Shelm, other individuals  and these “concerned citizen” organizations  may in fact really be 21st century incarnations of the Ku Klux Klan.

These emotinally charged, hysterical demonstrations at the town hall meetings are more than just spirited disagreement over health care reform.  I don’t recall anyone ever photo shopping a swastika around Hillary Clinton’s neck  or a mustache over her upper lip during the public debates  over health care reform in 1993. Can you?  Not even Richard Nixon was exposed to such public vitriol. Rush Limbaugh and Glen Beck have publically gone on the record characterizing the popular and lawfully elected 44th President of the United States as a racist!!!  Who’s “sensibilities” do you imagine these men seek to foment?

The legitimate media is largely silent about the possibility of militia/KKK involvement.  The shouting is all you tend to see in the clips while the red faced Congressperson shrinks away annulled and defeated.  Then there’s the polite skirting around the putrefying dead bodies in the room by the news analysts and contract contributors.  Their dispassionate, carefully constructed comments chafe those of us who recognize these  purulent utterances as code. Harry and Louise were products of Madison Ave and Lee Atwater. They weren’t real!

These people shouting down our elected representatives are not sitting at home at the kitchen table drinking coffee with their spouses, David Gergen.  Who are they drinking coffee with?

Why have Sarah Palin’s regurgitated diatribes gone unchallenged by the press? Which one of these so-called “concerned citizens” groups pays her honorariums?  Perhaps there needs to be more investigation and less pontification.  Where are the investigative journalists?   What is everybody afraid of?

Is it all 360 now?  When you draw a circle, the protractor point gets driven into the paper only once and that’s where the circle begins and ends.  It starts with the reporting of the screaming and yelling and ends up with the reporting of the screaming and yelling.  All around the circle is Michael Jackson’s face morphing, Jon and Kate, pop up squirrels and the shameless promotion of their networks on Twitter.  Is Rachel Maddow the only one digging deep to find out where the “scary information” is coming from?

I applaud Barney Frank.  He had a right to be incensed.  At least he said something instead of merely looking shell shocked and befuddled.  He didn’t try to mitigate the woman’s  inflammatory, hate rhetoric by characterizing it as the frustration and anger of the citizens. The Ku Klux Klan were frustrated and angry by the integration of the University of Alabama in 1963.  They were frustrated and angry over the the “Freedom Rides” desegregating public transportation throughout the south. They were frustrated and angry over James E. Chaney, Andrew Goodman and Michael Schwerner working to register black voters in Mississippi in 1964.

People get  frustrated and angry all the time.  It doesn’t justify abandoning all reason, ignoring established facts and the disregard of verifiable truth.  It doesn’t justify verbally abusing our elected representatives and disgarding all civility and rules of decorum. It doesn’t justify  equating our nation’s President with an individual who was responsible for the deaths of  six million European Jews, and millions of Catholics, homosexuals, people of color and Jehovah’s Witnesses. An individual whose very name and image congers up only contempt, and pain– pain for the living descendants of the Holocaust survivors and pain for the veterans and living descendants of the men and women who served during WWII.

It’s hate rhetoric.  It’s a scare tactic.  It’s the propagation of hate masquerading as frustration and anger over health care reform.  It’s the new terroism.  Don’t let them scare you out of the public option!

This article has put a great deal of focus on the similarities between Hitler and Obama, and they are indeed numerous. Indeed, I never even got around to most of it, such as the Hitler/Obama muslim connection, or gestures they share in their oratory, or even much depth into their shared views of socialism. (I will discuss Obama’s socialist/marxist views at length in a later post.) An encyclopedia could be written documenting the parallels.

An encyclopedia?!!?

Don’t let them scare you into backing away from the public option, Mr. Obama!  And the rest of you..?  Steer clear of dining room tables.

Jubilee Year

In Barack Obama, Current Events, Economy, Society on February 22, 2009 at 1:00 am

A couple months ago I applied for a job at Marine base in San Diego that paid $10.00 an hour. You would have to wait at least half a year before health and life insurance benefits would kick in.

On the second interview, there was a panel of three with a list of questions and after each response (and even during), they would be busy jotting down notes. I remind you, this was a clerical, data entry, accounting position, on a Marine base in San Diego, that paid a whopping $10.00 an hour and offered no health benefits until after six months!  Hardly a corner office on the 80th floor.

One of the questions I was asked was what were my goals for the next five years. I am a college grad. I went back to college 10 years later and earned a K-12 teaching certificate. I taught in America’s urban schools for six years. Today, I am 51 years old, and I am unemployed. My five year goals are to be:

(1).  alive. John Kennedy, Jr. didn’t live to see 51. Diana, Princess of Wales didn’t. Eddie Kendricks didn’t. Billy Stewart didn’t. Kurt Cobain, Marilyn Monroe, Phyllis Hyman, John Coltrane, Martin Luther King, Jr., Bobby Kennedy, John F. Kennedy, Malcolm X, Medgar Evers, Jimmy Hendricks, Janis Joplin, River Phoenix, Donny Hathaway, those four little girls, Heath Ledger, David Foster Wallace, none of these people, not one, lived to see 51.

(2).  able to support myself (pay my bills) and not be a burden to my only child

(3).  able to care for my English Bulldog (EBD) ThatOne

(4).  able to have an EBD companion for ThatOne.

(5).  employed; to still be doing an honest days work; drive home; love my son; support my dogs.  Live a balanced life.

Alive.  Able.  Employed.  That’s it.   These are my simple, basic, unglamorous goals.

I don’t need diamonds and pearls.  I desire to remain content.  If ThatOne needs a hip x-ray I want to be able to afford that. When I run out of Bare Minerals, I want to be able to afford to replenish that.  I like to go to the movies. I love Asian cuisine.

I need access to the Internet. I enjoy my iTunes. That’s it. All I want to do is live until I die.

I have no delusions of grandeur. My needs and my wants are simple. I just want to feel content, just like I do now, only without the fear and anxiety. All I want to do is live until I die.

I have never been arrested. I have never committed a crime. I am a Christian.  I love God’s word, the bible. I don’t smoke, do drugs, drink to excess or indulge profanity.  I love to dance.  I love film. I love music. I appreciate writers and their writing. I love NPR and Public television. I enjoy Merlot, a good book, good news,  Stephen Colbert and a good joke. I am the Queen of Pop Culture and yet  I don’t watch The Bachelor or American Idol. I believe Ellen DeGeneres and Michelle Obama must be among, if not the most fortunate people on earth right now.

You would like me. I know I do.

There is a slovenly, bearded man who walks up and down Hwy 76 here every day, undoubtedly toting everything he owns. Every time I pass him by, I wonder: Where is he going? Why is he homeless? What’s his story? Who was he? Who is he now? Where did he come from? Why is he homeless? How did he come to be homeless? Why does he scare me?

Where do I want to be in five years? Ask me where I don’t want to be. I don’t want to be homeless, wandering up and down Hwy 76 or any other Highway in America. I don’t want to be pushing a shopping cart full of all my belongings up and down East Vista Way or any other Way in America. I don’t want to go to bed hungry. I don’t want to have to go without my Bare Minerals, or a shower or toilet. I don’t want to be afraid every day, or utterly and completely alone. Invisible. YOU (Employers; EE’s), YOU have the power to affect the course of a fellow Human Beings’ life.   Think about that.  YOU have the power!!!

Wow.

Who are You? I really want to know.

Don’t you?

http://www.barackobama.com/displayer/pages/econ-stories.php

Back during the Jewish system of things, every 50 years there was the Jubilee Year. The Hebrew word yoh-vel or yo-vel means “ram’s horn.” The sho-phar would be sounded during the 50th year to proclaim liberty throughout the land. Le 25:9. The Land was to have complete rest. This meant freedom for Hebrew slaves, the return of all hereditary land possessions sold because of family financial reversals, and individuals returned to their families who had been sold into slavery.

“No family was to sink into the depth of perpetual poverty. No one should come to be poor among you.” Le 25:8-10, 13; De 15:4, 5.

“The Jubilee law, when obeyed, preserved the nation from gravitating into the sad state that we observe today, where there are virtually two classes, the extremely rich and the extremely poor. The benefits to the individual strengthened the nation in that none would be underprivileged and crushed into unproductiveness by an economic crisis, but that all would contribute their knowledge, skills, talents and abilities to the national welfare. The law was read to the people during the Festival of Booths (De 31:10-12).*

It would be great if the stimulus money was funneled directly to each and every American with an income under $250,000.00. These families know how to stimulate themselves (http://killinmesoftly.wordpress.com/2008/12/11/so-president-elect-obama-if-yer-lissnin/).

These families would pay their bills off. Their paying down their bills would infuse money into businesses, money every American could all see and account for. This revenue infusion would stimulate business and perhaps extinguish layoffs.

The economy would be stimulated the old fashioned way:  by honest-hearted people happily paying their bills, and businesses happily  investing in their businesses, encouraging competition, promoting Laissez faire (from the French, meaning to leave alone or to allow to do is an economic and political doctrine that holds that economies function most efficiently when unencumbered by government regulation. Laissez faire advocates favor individual self-interest and competition, and oppose the taxation and regulation of commerce).

Adam Smith, father of classical economics, maintained in Wealth of Nations (1776) that Britain’s goal should have been the promotion of the welfare of individuals, rather than centering on national power and prestige. Freely functioning economies were capable of bestowing benefits to all levels of society**.

I wish President Obama publicly endorsed this more far-reaching, more historical grasp of economics and  history. We could learn a lot from looking at the original, pre-Christian model. The Jewish model failed because it was ahead of its time, and the people then did not support it as it should have been supported. Its legacy, however, lives on as a lesson for us today.

When I listen to the political shouting heads in the news, I am astonished by how unknowledgeable, naïve and utterly disinterested the House and Congress are in the financial machinations of Wall street and the Hamiltonian system. We have already “loaned” billions to companies that cannot account for how they spent this money.

Clearly, this infusion of cash during the last days of Bush 43’s administration did absolutely nothing to bolster the current economy. I want to know what happened to every cent of that initial bailout money. I want to know what happened to every cent of that initial bailout money. I want to know what happened to every cent of that initial bailout money!! Will I ever? Will the country?

Obama’s stimulus bill has already passed now. Can we learn lessons any from the old, pre-Christian Jubilee Year? Yes we can.

foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com

*Insight On The Scriptures |Watchtower Bible and Tract Society NYC | Vol II | 1998

**http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h844.html

Everybody Knows I’m Not Like That

In Barack Obama, Current Events, Racism, Society on February 20, 2009 at 1:00 am
FOX Forum
You Decide

Are We a ‘Nation of Cowards’ When It Comes to Race?

In a speech on February 18 marking Black History month Attorney General Eric Holder said:

“Though this nation has proudly thought of itself as an ethnic melting pot, in things racial we have always been and continue to be, in too many ways, essentially a nation of cowards. Though race related issues continue to occupy a significant portion of our political discussion, and though there remain many unresolved racial issues in this nation, we, average Americans, simply do not talk enough with each other about race.”

Some critics have called Holder’s comments “offensive” and others can lauded them as “honest” and “constructively provocative.”

YOU DECIDE: Are we a nation of cowards when it comes to race? http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2009/02/19/youdecide_holder_race/

Given the right situation and circumstance, the average, every day, experienced, habitual  practitioner of racism tend to be people who have an entrenched belief that they themselves are not racists.  

“You, African American, Black person, descendant of slaves may not work in my office, but I will happily welcome an Asian immigrant.  See?  I accept other races, therefore I am not racist.  How does this make me a coward?”

“You, African American, Black person, descendant of slaves may not work in my office.  I will not welcome your presence.  I will make the environment sooo hostile, so unpleasant.  I will try to provoke an anger response from you at every turn, and when you choose not to allow yourself to be provoked, I will decide you are a coward, you are weak and therefore I am entitled to torment you until you either quit or we succeed in getting you fired.  But my Middle Eastern immigrant co-worker likes me and I allow him so, see?  I’m not a racist.  How does this make me a coward?”

On Wednesday, February 18, Rupert Murdoch’s  New York Post published this political cartoon.  It clearly personifies our nation’s 44th president as a chimpanzee shot multiple times by police. 

The incendiary ramifications of this seemingly benign expression of 5th Amendment privilege is beyond the pale. It’s 2009.  We have elected an African American President and yet this decades old, hateful, racist comparison is still a subject for even-handed debate?  When are we going to simply just say no–  to racism?

If the subject of this so-called political cartoon was the Holocaust, the public outcry would have been overwhelmingly unanimous in its outrage.  The paper would have issued an apology so fast, the incident would have escaped the notice of the ladies of The View.  But no.

This cartoon has been defended as freedom of speech.  I have the right to yell fire in a crowded movie theater, but no one would defend this conduct in the absence of a fire, especially if people were hurt.  Just because you have the right to say it, doesn’t mean it’s right to say it. The defenders’ voices are also astonishingly mute around the fact that this cartoon’s inception and publication is a moral outrage.  It’s the middle finger in the face of every American who held a mistaken belief we were inching toward turning the page on collective racism.  

This cartoon is wrong on so many levels.  It invokes the memories of  Eleanor BumpursAmadou DialloSean Bell and reminds us of the antipathy that exists between the NYC police department and the black community.  It personifies our President as an animal, a “monkey.”

And then there’s that nasty subliminal subtext that makes it impossible for any thinking person not to reference Martin Luther King, Jr, Robert Kennedy, Medgar Evers, Abraham Lincoln, men all felled in a hail of an assassin’s bullets.   Worse, it has as its primary goal to undermine and disrupt (perhaps even crush?) the spirit of healing and growth that has galvanized the American psyche of late.

People genuinely began to allow themselves to believe President Obama’s election was a sign America was inching toward acknowledgement of and reconciliation for past crimes, attitudes and conduct.  This hateful, cynical, mean illustration was clearly designed to remind “haters” that some things will never change.  That’s just the way it is.  It really is about control.

I find it hard to believe this cartoonist would think there was anything funny or innocuous or even clever about this!This cartoon should never have been approved for publication by the managing editor.

It’s interesting to note Dog, The Bounty Hunter is now quietly back on the air.  Don Imus is back behind the mike at 77WABC morning radio, yet Isaiah Washington appears to have fallen off the entertainment radar.  So the New York Post will just skate on this just like all the others. And so  on, and so on, and so on…

“Stop the Madness!”

So Attorney General Eric Holder, while I appreciate what your words were maybe trying to acheive, I’m just not sure the expression “nation of cowards” was a characterization that was especially useful.  Your words are out there now, though.  You can’t unring that bell.  You should have just said it outright instead of trying to soft-peddle the message.  I disagree.  We are not a nation of cowards.  We remain, however, both to our chagrin and our horror, a nation that continues to excuse and tolerate racism toward descendants of slaves.  

“Everybody knows I’m not like that.  See? I am not a coward!  Now get out of here and let me get back to business as usual in my African-American free office!”

So President-elect Obama, If Yer Liss’nin’…

In Barack Obama, Economy, News on December 11, 2008 at 6:29 pm

Dear President-elect Obama,

The nation is enormously pleased and excited about the appointments you’ve made, the depth of attention you’re devoting to the matter of this nation’s economy and the swiftness and intellectual seriousness you’re applying to resolve the matter.  It’s a great first start. 

Jobs must now and always be the focus. That was the major imperative FDR intuitively and immediately understood.  President-elect Obama, being the keen student of history you are, you know that during the thirties, FDR created public works projects that lead to jobs that lead to people getting back to work, that lead to the country feeling good about itself again, that restored confidence to individual Americans and restored America’s collective confidence in America.

All people who sincerely wanted to work had to do then was get up early enough to be among the first in line.  Employers recognized and believed it was their civic responsibility to hire all who wanted to work.  They believed they were helping rebuild America.  

                                                                       

Today the media talks about jobs and unemployment in cold, faceless statistics.  Federally funded, so-called job development agencies are perpetuating that mind set.  No one is on the side of the integrity of the American worker anymore, or is our government so completely removed from the hopes and dreams and aspirations of the “REAL” average American worker? 

The “REAL” average American worker has graduated from high school and has landed a job within ten miles of his home town, quickly married and immediately started a family.  They seem always to have two children:  a girl and a boy. They’re not shopping the market for the right “career fit.”  They’re content with living where they live, how they live, and with what they’re living for: their families, their homes and their communities. And the occasional pizza delivery.

The “REAL” average American family are people who sacrifice and live within their means.  They’re proud of what they do, proud they are able to support their families. They fervently need to be able to rely on the stability of their jobs, because this is the rock-solid foundation for everything they are and all that they do.  All other ground is sinking sand.

Once the job is in place, heads-of-households begin to plan for their futures and the immediate future of their children. Notice I said immediate, not long-term future of their children. The “REAL” average American family is not necessarily socking away money  for college for their children.  They believe, if this a desire their children have, it is their responsibility as parents to provide a secure, stable, nurturing home for their children to be able to excel throughout their public school career. 

Based on that record of excellence, the “REAL” average American family expect their children to get into college on scholarship, work, avail themselves to available student aid, work, do well in college, work, graduate, then work to pay off those student loans.  Notice the importance of the expectation of work. The children are grateful for the occasional care package they receive from their parents or the occasional money gift and their love, support and encouragement.  The children then pass these expectations and values on to their children.  The foundation of it all is their parent’s ability to get and sustain their jobs.

We seem to have forgotten how “REAL” average Americans feel about working.  They don’t care about having a “career trajectory.”  They just want to work.  They just  want to keep their jobs.  They want their parents to be proud of them.  They prefer to stick with those same co-workers.  They want to pay their bills.  They want to stay connected to their siblings.  They want to establish and maintain their friendships.  They love to talk about how long they’ve known this one or that one or how long they’ve been affiliated with their church, how close they are to their parents, or how long they’ve held that job.  Listen to the “REAL” average American and see what I say is true.

The “REAL” average American does not want glamour, they want consistency and stability.  They want to earn a paycheck so they can support their families and their communities and live where they’ve always lived all their lives.  They’re not whining about healthcare or spinning tales of woe about healthcare gone wrong.  They use nearby Urgent Care facilities, not emergency rooms. 

Now people are scared.  They’re eating eggs and Raaman noodles for dinner every night, and the worst part:  When they lose their jobs, it’s next to impossible to land another job.  Here is the real crisis of confidence, Mr. Obama.  It’s not because there are no jobs out there to be had, because there are.  It’s because there are far too many people, companies and agencies who have the power to hire but instead choose to serve their own self interests.  They are the ones who are really benefitting by turning the application process into a mean, protracted ordeal because it’s in their self interest–  It’s their job.  It’s what they do.  See how busy they are doing their job. 

They’re objective is not to fill positions especially.  They’re working to proliferate a process.  They reduce otherwise good people– devoted parents, sons, daughters, sisters, brothers, husbands, wives, aunts, uncles, cousins and friends, into a tidy heap of 8 1/2 by 11 tucked inside manila files.  It’s about paper, not people!

During the Depression, one person took your name and address, sized you up, and then pointed you toward where you were going to work (remember Russell Crowe’s Jim Braddock in Cinderella Man)? Millions of people went to work that way and continued to make this country great.  The Empire State building in New York City was erected during the Great Depression!  Today, you need a Vice-President of Human Resources, a Director of Human Resources, a HR Manager, several HR supervisors, and all of their HR administrative assistants.  And let’s not forget the Receptionist who everyone knows is the chief  screener.

You have to spend hours filling out one online application and you will still be expected to be packing a hard copy of your resume when you come to the interview.  As you stand on the outside longingly looking in, it hits you–   all these people at these various companies have jobs because you don’t.  If this went on in the ‘30’s and ‘40’s, we would never have put people back to work and grown the economy as steadily as FDR did.

Mr. President-elect, if you’re still with me here, there are two rather simple ways you and your crack team can facilitate job growth within the first six months of your presidency.  What you have to do is: 

1. Appeal to companies desire to prove to Americans just how committed to America they truly are.  They must relax (or better yet, eliminate altogether) the arduous application process that is demoralizing the spirit of all those who can, are willing and able, and who simply want to work, not write a book.

People who don’t work steadily are people who can’t pay bills, keep up with a mortgage, maintain an expensive hobby or hunt moose.  People who don’t work stay home and find other, inexpensive, “creative” ways to cope, mechanisms that may not be the most physically, emotionally or spiritually helpful.

2. Appeal to companies to suspend the practice of using staffing agencies to fill positions with contract or temporary workers to whom they don’t  provide healthcare benefits. People will work without benefits in exchange for permanent employment status.

I guarantee these two simple appeals will get real people back to work! 

For years, this quote “Actors are cattle” was attributed to Alfred Hitchcock, the famous director of Psycho, The Birds and Rear Window.  During a televised awards ceremony, (which I was watching, by the way), Mr. Hitchcock clarified the misquote saying “I never said actors are cattle.  I said actors should be treated like cattle.”  

Everyone’s out doing themselves publicly decrying outsourcing and jobs being shipped overseas.  This little talked about, horrid, hateful, practice of using valuable human resources (people) as temporary/contract workers has kept families living in fear and on the edge and for years!  People are being treated like cattle.  There should be some outcry about that!

Companies need to post “HELP WANTED” signs, announce the number of jobs they’re needing to fill, and then have their HR personnel walk the line.  If every company in the nation did this, every person in this nation who truly wants to work will work.   Poseyal Desposyni Poet

Maybe CEO’s and COO’s can demonstrate their altruism and their commitment to America by donating the disposable portion of their salaries and bonuses (the part their using to buy yachts, and maintain multiple homes and cars and their expensive memberships in country clubs) toward the newly hired who waited on that line. Demonstrate that spirit of self-sacrifice that once was a moral descriptor of American. Just long enough to see America though this crisis and until she gets back on her feet.  

The Great Depression lasted 14 long, hard years, but throughout, Americans came to the real aid of other Americans, not by donating millions of dollars to some charity, or think-tank consortiums, or adopting foreign children, but by providing work to those who simply want to work.

President-elect Obama, we don’t need a stimulus check.  We know how to stimulate ourselves.  President Obama, people want jobs, not stimulus checks!  depression by

That’s all.  Thanks for listening.

Well… At Least Moms Mabley Was Funny

In Michelle Obama, News, Parenting, Politics on June 19, 2008 at 4:01 am

I wish I had a sample of the “ka doi-ing” from Law and Order. That sound always seems to punctuate things just right.

The broadcast media is still energetically consoling themselves with maudlin (witness the James Carville/Mary Maitlin meltdown on the set of Meet the Press this past Sunday), and contrived (the shot of Luke, posing JFK-like in shadow, touching his father’s empty chair on the set of Meet the Press) tributes to Tim Russert.

Don’t get me wrong, I admired Tim Russert. I occasionally tuned in to Meet the Press. Even though I sensed his being overly preoccupied with complying with the imperatives of the network sometimes stifled an initiative to ask the tough questions, his journalistic integrity was leagues above all the screamers and shouters who clearly have the ear, heart and half-a-brain of Elisabeth Hasselbeck.

I am sorry he’s gonna miss this election in November. The world is going to miss his point of view, but I must admit I’m glad the televised long good-bye and the public displays of  ”weeping and the gnashing of their teeth*“ will finally be over.  “Ka doi-ing!” Moving on…

Then I made the mistake of tuning into The View yesterday morning. I wanted to see Michelle Obama. She looked marvelous! Her makeup was impeccable. Somebody really knew how to tone down those pointy eyebrows. I loved the little frock she was wearing.

She got to be on the panel, not a guest. She got to stand with some nutritionist discussing whether breakfast really is the most important meal of the day. She got to sit next to milquetoast Matthew Broderick while he explained his five year old’s preference for Senator Obama and promote not one but two (really bad) films he’s in. She got to largely ignore the annoyingly grating, always incoherent, trembling prattle of Elisabeth Hasselbeck. (Barbara and the nation all held their collective breath. Would there be a bimbo eruption? Mercifully, not today).

She got to listen without correction or comment as the adorable, but intellectually vacant Sherrie Shepherd mangled her eldest daughter’s name. But even all that wasn’t the “ka doi-ing!” She had to sit in stunned silence, without betraying even the slightest hint of disgust, shock and outrage, while toad after warty toad leapt, head first, from out of the mouth of Whoopi (aka Karen Johnson) Goldberg, each one landing with a resounding thud. Back in the day, when a Black person behaved badly in public or pulled a stunt like Sammy Davis, Jr. putting the squeeze on Richard Nixon, Black folk observing the behavior would say “He’s an embarrassment, ” or “She’s a disgrace to the race.”

This morning, Whoopi Goldberg’s utterly idiotic, totally out of left field, itchy and scratchy, astonishingly inappropriate, bizarre comment about Black women with no teeth or a mouthful of gold teeth who were not light skinned but “dark” like Michelle and she,  was off the charts disgraceful.

Oh, what I wouldn’t give to be a fly on the wall of the Obama home as Barack and Michelle settle in front of the TV to watch the show together. I imagine the conversation going something like this:

Barack: What..? What’s she saying here?  Ya’know, what… what’s she talkin’ about?

Michelle: Dear Heart, you know I don’t have any idea. I had to freeze every muscle in my face so I wouldn’t get caught on camera lookin’ like ‘This u ‘gly bitch said what?’ I heard she was born and raised in New York City.  She from New York City, right?

Barack: By way of Alabama, I guess. Wonder what kind of Black folk she grew up watchin’ on TV. Sounds like she talkin’ ’bout Moms Mabley.Moms Mabley

Michelle: Well, at least Moms Mabley was funny.

Uproarious laughter…  And scene.  (a beat)

Take a little time to avoid The View“Ka doi-ing!”

Asides or Racing thoughts:

  • Barack Obama, don’t go to Iraq before the election! Remember Mike Dukakis. Remember Mike Dukakis!Michael Dukakis in an M1 Abrams tank.
  • Chris Matthews, a possible replacement for Tim Russert? I say No.., no.., no!
  • Andrea Mitchell, a possible replacement for Tim Russert? Yes!
  • Barack Obama and Al Gore. Perfect together.
  • Hillary’s “full-throated” endorsement of Barack Obama is beginning to look like OJ’s search for Nicole’s “real” killer.
  • Elisabeth Hasselbeck’s contract. Is it up for renewal yet?

*Matt 8:12

Don’t push me ’cause I’m close to the edge…

In Barack Obama, Current Events, Politics on June 11, 2008 at 12:01 am

“A fist bump? A pound? A terrorist fist jab? The gesture everyone seems to interpret differently.”  E.D. Hill on the June 6 edition of Fox News’ America’s Pulse 

When I witnessed the Obama fist-bump, I for one thought it was cute.

This couple seems to have a real marriage going on up in here, not just a strategic partnership.  Not that there’s anything wrong with that. I admire the Clinton’s relationship. Sometimes intellectual compatibility is better than great sex. Theirs is the modern day public personification of “philia,” the Greek term for friendship or amiability; a crucial component of the good life.

In contrast to the desiring and passionate yearning of eros, philia entails a fondness and appreciation of the other. For the Greeks, the term philia incorporated not just friendship, but also loyalties to family and polis-one’s political community, job, or discipline. Philia for another may be motivated, as Aristotle explains in the Nicomachean Ethics, Book VIII, for the agent’s sake or for the other’s own sake.

The motivational distinctions are derived from love for another because the friendship is wholly useful as in the case of business contacts, or because their character and values are pleasing.  Friendships of a lesser quality may also be based on the pleasure or utility that is derived from another’s company. A business friendship is based on utility–on mutual reciprocity.*

That pretty much describes the Clinton union, don’t you agree?  

Maybe that’s why so many people admire Hillary Clinton.  Her bruising fight in 1993 to implement a universal health care plan, the way she interacted with her husband, then President Bill Clinton.  I especially admired her choice to remain in her marriage despite the crescendo of voices that ridiculed and derided this courageous, intelligent, and deeply personal decision.

I admired how she weathered that humiliating media conflagration and emerged looking like someone devoted to principle rather that someone who cuts and runs.   For me, throughout that difficult time,  she set an excellent example, not by whining and crying and acting like a victim  but by facing her problems head on, with no shame, no blame and no excuses. 

She didn’t take the easy way out.  She took the heat rather than get out of the kitchen. That took a depth of dignity and an intestinal fortitude that, in the less capable, would have precipitated a tawdry public pity party. She kept her eyes focused on the prize not the papers and, no doubt after much soul searching, concluded she was probably better with this man than she would be without him.

After a careful examination of twenty-three years of marriage, she could see clearly from her vantage point something all the TV psychologists and media skeptics could not.  She would not throw the baby out with the bath water.  Bill Clinton may have revealed himself to the nation to be a flawed man, but he was her flawed man. The decision to stay or not to stay was nobody’s business but hers.  And here we all are ten years later and no weepy, salacious tell-all.  She got the big picture.

“Our lives are a mixture of different roles. Most of us are doing the best we can to find whatever the right balance is . . . For me, that balance is family, work, and service.”**

What a breath of cool, minty-fresh air the Obama union portends to bring to the American political scene. It’s abundantly clear they have it going on in all areas of the love triad:  eros, philia, agape.  I guess Ms Hill and her associates, on the other hand, are perhaps maybe wanting in at least one of these major areas for them to be able, not only to glean a microscopic participle of terrorism out of the affection of the Obama fist-bump in Minnesota on the evening of June 3, but to open her mouth irresponsibly, to vomit out this fat, slimy, warty toad to plop where ever it may.

Now in her defense, Ms Hill very likely did not write the tease but merely read from the tele-prompter.  Both she and Fox News, however,  have put forward a hollow explanation of  the unfortunate analogy.  It still leaves a bad taste in my mouth.  Why would Fox News feel it’s journalistically justifiable and OK to compare the Obama’s display of support and mutual affection with terrorism?  Is this what Fox is calling the news?  

Tell Fox News this is appalling and unacceptable, and demand an apology from Rupert Murdoch and Roger Ailes.

Get off your butts and do something!

Sign the Petition.

Call Fox News.

Tell Your Friends.

 

 

*(Source: http://www.iep.utm.edu/l/love.htm#SH2c )

**(Source: http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/firstladies/hc42.html)

Post title from The Message | Grandmaster Flash and the Furious Five | 1982

And I Am Telling You I’m Not Going

In Barack Obama, History, Life, News, Politics on June 4, 2008 at 12:15 am

And I am telling you I’m not going!
You’re the best man I’ll ever know.
There’s no way I can ever, ever go,
No, no, no, no way,
No, no, no, no way I’m livin’ without you.
Oh, I’m not livin’ without you,
I’m not livin’ without you.
I don’t wanna be free.
I’m stayin’,
I’m stayin’,
And you, and you,
You’re gonna love me.

Did anyone with half a brain really believe Hillary was going to graciously concede the nomination to Barack Obama, or (as has been her usual MO), would she continue to scratch and claw a bloody trail into the wall of her temple of broken dreams?  

In her combative, defiant, passive aggressive, shrill and confrontational speech last night (a speech devoid of even a scintilla of conciliation or genuine charity) Hillary Clinton all but begged her supporters (all 18 million of them) to go to her website.  Why? To help her decide if she should stay in the race and continue to fight for those 18 million (hard working white people) who have been made to feel invisible saying:    

“Now the question is where do we go from here and given how far we’ve come and where we need to go as a party, it’s a question I don’t take lightly.  This has been a long campaign and I will be making no decisions tonight.”

Hillary continues to play the “I have the popular vote” card.  This was a legitimate argument in 2000 when, in the general, two-party election, Al Gore lost to George Bush even though he’d won the popular vote.  But this is the Democratic nomination process.  The argument and Hillary’s stubborn insistance on pointing this out every chance she gets is as polarizing as it is desperate.

What does she hope to gain by showing this decidedly unappealing aspect of her character? Is this a person who will restore the country’s reputation abroad?  Does she imagine she will bully Obama into choosing her as his running mate?  Six months ago, I thought that would be a dream ticket. Now…  Oh, the horror. I believe she would work covertly to undermine President Obama and establish herself as some sort of co-president.  I hope Senator Obama does not allow himself to be pressured into putting her on the ticket.

“This is our moment.  This is our time”  the presumptive Democratic nominee declared.  Not even Hillary Clinton could put the cabash on Barack Obama’s moment because it was not only his historic moment, but also the nation’s.  This was a moment Hillary should have shared, but for reasons that are entirely her own right now, she chose not to.

Nearly one hundred and fifty years ago, Abraham Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation which declared:  

“all persons held as slaves within any States, or designated part of the State, the people whereof shall be in rebellion against the United States, shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free.”

I did experience a pang of emotion that I was utterly taken aback by.   This was big. Obama was right.  It really was our moment.  In stark contrast to Hillary, whose speech was all about her and what she has done and the 18 million who voted for her (Is she planning to hold these voters out as pawns in order to negotiate some political position for herself?  Shame on you, Hillary), Obama’s speech articulated and embraced all our hopes for the country and affirmed our collective belief in our “highest ideals and our highest aspirations.”

In spite of Hillary’s unfortunate and jaundiced performance, last night was a special and historic night.  Nothing anyone could do or say will ever diminish that. Barack Obama is the Democratic nominee for the office of President of the United States of America.  Say it loud!